Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75.1% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work, and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
A 2.8% high-low range - a 2 standard deviation move using a 1-year sample – is one way we can understand the extent of movement, while in the options world 1-week implied volatility has picked up sharply and is trading 2.4 vols above 1-week realised vol.
(Source: Tradingview - Past performance is not indicative of future performance)
244k contracts traded in front-month gold futures is punchy but it's not outrageous, while our own flow has been well above average, which won’t shock – clients are now fairly net long, with 78% of all open positions held long – of course, this is not investment flow, and is trading capital that aggregates all different styles and timeframes, where the average duration of hold periods is ultra-short-term.
Whether I looked at the recent subdued implied volatility, or just through the price action in XAUUSD, everything was screaming out that range trading was still the play – clearly this view has been challenged – this thesis was also backed by the fact both nominal and real Treasuries have held tight a range since early August. Where until the debt ceiling is solved, which may take some time, then US bond yields wouldn’t be able to sustain a steep march higher, typically a gold negative.
USD strength has also kicked in, which has weighed on XAUUSD, and we’ve seen the USD work well against all G10 currencies, notably the higher beta plays like the ZAR and AUD. There has been some selling in US Treasuries, but 10yr real (inflation-adjusted) rates/TIPS are only up 3bp at -1.02%.
(Source: Tradingview - Past performance is not indicative of future performance)
My own view here is that while we may have seen some technical selling on the break of $1776 –predominantly this was a flow driven move, as it was far over the usual correlations we see with the USD and real rates and it screams of a fund(s) dumping gold exposure – the fact one fund manager at Blackrock (Russ Koesterich) disclosed on Bloomberg TV that he had reduced a significant position in gold to almost zero, tells me many of the big players are seeing reduced utility in gold as a hedge against the global central bank experiment, and gold is front running a rise in real rates.
A 3bp move higher in real Treasuries, meaning inflation-adjusted returns becomes less negative, may be small fry, but when funds and money managers feel we could be moving from -100bp to -50bp in US 10yr real Treasuries, it does make one consider their diversification plays. This view may still be premature ahead of the debt ceiling, which could become a market mover into November, and has the premise to keep bond yields suppressed – but I guess someone in the market is seeing a positive resolution which will ultimately lead to an increased supply of Treasuries and improved economics in Q4, married with the tapering of QE.
We also might be seeing funds positioning ahead of next week’s FOMC meeting – we’ll cover this in more depth on Monday, but on one hand, the view is we will get 'advanced notice' that tapering is coming, perhaps in November or December. On the other, we will get a new set of fed funds projections (‘dot plot’), and the possibility that the median estimate shifts the degree of hikes in 2023 from two hikes, to possibly three. Things get interesting in the 2024 estimate, and if the estimate for 2023 lifts to 0.875%, then one could easily see an estimate at 1.63% in 2024 – portraying an additional three hikes in 2024.
The move in gold is short-term oversold, but does this offer a signal for trading longs or will rallies be short live, where strength offers entry points for shorts in the hope of a bear trending market into the FOMC?
The material provided here has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Whilst it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research we will not seek to take any advantage before providing it to our clients. Pepperstone doesn’t represent that the material provided here is accurate, current or complete, and therefore shouldn’t be relied upon as such. The information, whether from a third party or not, isn’t to be considered as a recommendation; or an offer to buy or sell; or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, financial product or instrument; or to participate in any particular trading strategy. It does not take into account readers’ financial situation or investment objectives. We advise any readers of this content to seek their own advice. Without the approval of Pepperstone, reproduction or redistribution of this information isn’t permitted.