Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • 中文版
  • English
  • 交易方式

    概览

    定价

    交易账户

    Pro

    高净值客户

    好友推荐计划

    活跃交易者计划

    交易时间

    维护计划

  • 交易平台

    概述

    交易平台

    集成

    交易工具

  • 市场与产品

    概述

    外汇

    股票

    交易所交易基金

    指数

    大宗商品

    货币指数

    指数差价合约股息

    股票差价合约股息

    差价合约远期

  • 市场分析

    概述

    市场导航

    每日简报

    会见分析师

  • 学习交易

    概述

    交易指南

    网络研讨会

  • 合作伙伴

  • 关于我们

  • 帮助和支持

  • 中文版
  • English

分析

GBP

February 2024 BoE Preview: The Old Lady’s Soon For Turning

Michael Brown
Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
2024年1月24日
Share
The first MPC decision of the year should see the ‘Old Lady’ remaining on hold, with Bank Rate maintained at its present level of 5.25%. However, having maintained the same hawkish forward guidance since last August, the BoE is becoming increasingly out of step with G10 peers, particularly as inflation continues to fall back towards target, and as economic activity shows increasing signs of petering out, raising expectations for Governor Bailey & Co. to adopt a more cautious stance.

As noted, the first MPC meeting of the year should conclude with the Committee voting to maintain Bank Rate at 5.25%, equal to the highest level since early-2008, and extending a rate hold that began last August, with the tightening cycle now clearly at an end. Unsurprisingly, money markets price no chance of any change to Bank Rate at the February meeting, with a similarly slim chance seen of any move at the following meeting in mid-March.

Preview

While Bank Rate is near certain to remain unchanged, the vote split among MPC members is something of a more complex matter. After a 6-3 vote to hold rates at the December meeting, with external MPC members Greene, Haskel and Mann dissenting in favour of a 25bp hike, it once again seems likely that the Committee will be split in terms of the appropriate rate move.

Though there has been relatively little by way of fresh economic data since the final meeting of 2023, recent remarks have pointed to some, including Haskel, beginning to view things through a more cautious lens, though the recent upside surprise in December’s CPI figures – more on which below – may have tempered such caution. In any case, as the lagged impacts of prior tightening continue to be felt, particularly with around 4 million households set to refinance mortgages this year, it seems likely that those hawkish dissenters on the MPC will, gradually, join consensus and stop voting for a hike. Furthermore, external member Dhingra, who last voted in favour of a hike in November 2022, seems likely to be the first to vote for a rate cut, though the February meeting may prove too early for such a dovish dissent.

Speaking of cuts, OIS currently prices just over 100bp of easing from the BoE in 2024, fully pricing the first 25bp cut for June. This is pace is, likely, roughly in line with what the MPC would consider reasonable at this juncture, though clearly out of line with the guidance provided in the most recent policy statement.

Preview

At the December meeting, the MPC reiterated the relatively hawkish guidance that has been given for six months now, noting that policy will need to be “sufficiently restrictive for sufficiently long” to return inflation to the 2% target, while also flagging the risk of further policy tightening if evidence of “more persistent inflationary pressures” were to present itself.

This guidance presents something of an issue for the MPC. Given that the next move in Bank Rate is set to be a cut, likely towards the end of the first half of the year, the Committee will need to begin to lay the groundwork for such a move early on, to avoid eroding credibility by delivering a rate reduction, while continuing to guide towards further hikes. Removing reference to ‘further tightening’ at the February meeting seems like the most obvious first step on this road, though the ‘higher for longer’ stance will probably be reiterated, primarily to avoid an unwarranted and undesirable loosening in financial conditions.

That said, the MPC have historically displayed a tendency to prefer to signal the policy path via shifts in their forecasts, as opposed to explicit guidance changes.

The inflation forecast has been the primary signalling mechanism in the past, and will probably be so once again, with the CPI path conditioned on a constant Bank Rate likely to point to an undershoot of the 2% target over the medium-term, while that conditioned on the market-implied rate path points to a more sustained return to that level. The implication of all this being that, by and large, the path markets currently price is the more appropriate one.

Preview

On the subject of inflation, it’s important to note that progress on disinflation has somewhat stalled of late. Headline CPI unexpectedly ticked higher to 4.0% YoY in December, while core CPI remained at 5% YoY for the second straight month; notably, though, this uptick in headline inflation was driven largely by a rise in alcohol and tobacco duties, which policymakers are likely to look through.

Of more concern will be the sticky and stubborn nature of services inflation, which has now remained north of 6% YoY for 15 consecutive months, and shows little sign of budging. While this has been a worry for some time, elevated services prices are a growing inflationary risk for the economy, particularly as goods inflation seems likely to make something of a resurgence amid ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, resulting in extended Asia-Europe transit times as shipping companies avoid the Red Sea.

Preview

Services inflation continues to be underpinned by a relatively tight labour market, though jobs data must continue to be taken with a ‘pinch of salt’, as the ONS continue to refine a new methodology for data collection, after a dramatic decline in response rates to the prior labour force survey (LFS).

Per the aforementioned ‘experimental’ data, unemployment remained at 4.2% in the three months to November, having been broadly unchanged over the second and third quarters of last year. While the MPC’s present end-24 unemployment forecast of 4.8%, followed by a further rise to 5.0% in 2025, appears a little punchy, any significant downward revisions appear unlikely at this stage, given data quality issues.

The MPC will, however, likely be pleased with the recent modest softening in earnings pressures, with regular pay growth having fallen to 6.6% YoY in November, down from a peak of almost 9% during the summer. With this pace continuing to represent real earnings growth of just shy of 3%, the MPC will likely want to see a further cooling, in order to exert further downward pressure on services prices.

Preview

Meanwhile, on growth, the outlook for the UK economy appears rather mixed. Retail sales unexpectedly fell over 3% MoM during the festive period, likely subtracting around 0.05pp from output in the final quarter of 2023, raising the chances of GDP having notched a second straight quarterly contraction in Q4, following an 0.1% QoQ decline in Q3 – confirming a technical recession if so.

Despite this, more up-to-date indicators appear to be pointing towards something of a rosier outlook. The most recent round of PMI surveys, for example, pointed to a relatively rapid pace of expansion as 2024 got underway, with both the services and composite measures rising to their highest levels since last summer, while the manufacturing index pointed to the slowest pace of contraction in 9 months.

Preview

Nevertheless, despite these mixed indicators, there seems little scope for significant revisions to the MPC’s GDP forecasts, with the economy already expected to stagnate on an annual basis this year, followed by a relatively anaemic 0.3% pace of growth in 2025. Any adjustments to these expectations are more likely as a result of shifting market-based rate expectations, rather than being a reflection of recent economic developments.

While the forecasts may lack intrigue, Governor Bailey’s post-decision press conference is likely to be of substantially more interest. Bailey faces something of a communications challenge, needing – as noted above – to lay the groundwork for a pivot towards a more dovish policy stance in the months ahead, while also needing to present forecasts condition on overly-optimistic rate expectations in the MPC’s eyes, as well as navigating an uncertain political environment with further fiscal loosening likely in the March Budget, and an election approaching later this year.

For the pound, the balance of risks appears to point toward a more dovish MPC than has been seen in recent months, particularly if the explicit reference to further hikes is removed from the statement.

Preview

Cable has, however, spent much of the last two months in a relatively tight 1.2600 – 1.2800 range, showing little desire to move outside of those trading bands, though the 50-day moving average has provided support to a very modest rally of late. Rallies, though, look ripe to be sold into at this stage, particularly as the USD continues to strengthen across the G10 board, as the ‘US exceptionalism’ narrative that ruled the roost through most of 2023 continues into the new year.


Related articles

January 2024 ECB Preview: Pushback Falling On Deaf Ears

January 2024 ECB Preview: Pushback Falling On Deaf Ears

EUR

此处提供的材料并未按照旨在促进投资研究独立性的法律要求准备,因此被视为市场沟通之用途。虽然在传播投资研究之前不受任何禁止交易的限制,但我们不会在将其提供给我们的客户之前寻求利用任何优势。

Pepperstone 并不表示此处提供的材料是准确、最新或完整的,因此不应依赖于此。该信息,无论是否来自第三方,都不应被视为推荐;或买卖要约;或征求购买或出售任何证券、金融产品或工具的要约;或参与任何特定的交易策略。它没有考虑读者的财务状况或投资目标。我们建议此内容的任何读者寻求自己的建议。未经 Pepperstone 批准,不得复制或重新分发此信息。。。

其他网站.

  • The Trade Off
  • 合作伙伴
  • 组.
  • 职业生涯

交易方式

  • 定价
  • 交易账户
  • Pro
  • 高净值客户
  • 活跃交易者计划
  • 朋友推荐
  • 交易时间

平台

  • 交易平台
  • 交易工具

市场与符号

  • 外汇
  • 股票
  • 交易所交易基金
  • 指数
  • 大宗商品
  • 货币指数
  • 加密货币
  • 差价合约远期

分析

  • 市场导航
  • 每日简报
  • Pepperstone 激石脉搏
  • 会见分析师

学习交易

  • 交易指南
  • 视频
  • 在线讲座
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
1300 033 375
Level 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street
墨尔本, VIC 澳大利亚 3008
  • 法律文件
  • 隐私政策
  • 网站条款与条件
  • Cookie政策
  • 举报人政策

风险警告:差价合约(CFD)是复杂的工具,由于杠杆作用,存在快速亏损的高风险。 81.3% 的散户投资者在于该提供商进行差价合约交易时账户亏损。您应该考虑自己是否了解差价合约的工作原理,以及是否有承受资金损失的高风险的能力

风险警告:差价合约和外汇交易是有风险的。它不适合每个人,如果你是一个专业客户,你的损失可能大大超过你的初始投资。你并不拥有相关资产或对其拥有权利。过去的业绩并不代表未来的业绩,而且税法可能会改变。本网站上的信息是一般性的,没有考虑到你的个人目标、财务状况或需求。你应该通过审查我们的目标市场的确定文件来考虑你是否属于我们的目标市场,并阅读我们的PDS和其他法律文件,以确保你在做出任何交易决定之前充分了解风险。我们鼓励你在必要时寻求独立建议。

Pepperstone Group Limited位于澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本柯林斯街727号第一座16楼,邮编VIC 3008,并由澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(Australian Securities and Investments Commission)许可和监管。 本网站上的信息以及所提供的产品和服务均不得分发给任何国家或地区(如果其分发或使用违反当地法律或法规)的任何人。

© 2025 Pepperstone Group Limited | 澳大利亚公司注册号 (ACN) 147 055 703 | 澳大利亚金融服务牌照号(AFSL) 414530